ENEMY PROPERTY (AMEND. and Validation) Act 2010 Withholding by Salman Khurshid , Naqvi, Azarruddin , Farrukh Abdulla Behest is Death Warrant For Hindus Assisnation

ENEMY PROPERTY ACT 1968 (Amm.and Validation) Bill 2010 withholding of same- death warrant to nationalist THE GOVERNMENT HAS AGRREED TO Amend the ENEMY PROPERTY (AMENDMENT AND VALIDATION) BILL 2010. WHETHER ISLAMIC BANKS WILL FINANCE JIHADI FOR KILLING HINDUS AND USURPATION OF HINDUS ACCOUNTS IN JAJIA TAX
WHETHER GERMANY IS STILL THE ENEMY COUNTRY OF INDIA UNDER DEFENCE OF INDIA ACT, 1932 ANDNETAJI SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE AND HIS  AZAD HIND ARMY IS STILL THE ENEMY , BUT NOT PAKISTAN AND BANGLA DESH? TWO DOMAIN INDIA AND PAKISTAN ARE COMMON WEALTH OF BRITISHERSEnemy Property Bill kept in abeyance in respect of JUDGEMENT , when ENTIRE PROPERTY USRPATION DONE BY HIGH COURT AND SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT  For Having PATRONAGE TO PAKISTANI'S AFAZAL , KASAB AFTER SACCHAR IN COMMISSION WAKF ACT 1935 TO PERISH THE EXISTENCE OF HINDUS FROM UTTER PRADESH The UPA government endorsed the present Enemy Act 1968 guiding the property rights of the properties left during the time of partition. The Enemy Property (Amendment and Validation) Bill 2010 that was introduced in Lok Sabha was kept in abeyance. According to the amendment bill courts would have no jurisdiction over occupation of properties which have been left behind by those who went to Pakistan at the time of partition. As a result of the amendment the custodian would find it difficult to continue with the occupation of such properties.The Bill, if passed, would have restricted Indian family members of those who then had migrated to Pakistan at the time of Partition from going to court to regain possession of the property of their forefathers. These properties were at that time seized as “enemy property” under an Act of 1968 and had been vested in a custodian. The Bill would have adversely affected large number of families staying in states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Assam and Maharashtra.The government was forced to promulgate an ordinance to bring an end to the rash of appeals in various High Courts demanding repossession of properties held by the custodian. This was initially triggered off by the Supreme Court order restoring the properties of the Rajah of Mehmoodabad to his heir, Mohammad Amir Mohammad Khan. This was a 32 year long battle in court that helped him gain the possession.
Custodian Custodian of Enemy Property for India is an Indian government department which is empowered to appropriate property in India owned by Pakistani nationals. Offices of the Custodian are located in Mumbai with a branch in Kolkata.
Economics Enemy Property Act was promulgated in 1968. Under the Act the Central Government of India was authorized to appoint a custodian for enemy property for India. The properties defined under the act included all immovable property, all lockers and safe deposits and all negotiable instruments such as promissory notes, shares, debentures and other Commerce. Citizens of India were banned from entering any transactions by way of granting development rights, sale or transfer or mortgage of 1/3rd of a property in India declared as "enemy" property. One of the estimates shows that there are over 2000 such properties across India. Enemy properties that are vested in custodian were valued at Rs. 29.40 crores in 1971.
These are in the form of:(i) Land, buildings etc. scattered throughout the country.(ii) vested firms’ securities, shares, debentures, etc. (iii) Bank balances, cash; and (iv) Provident fund balances and gratuity.
Similarly Indians, who then had migrated from Pakistan to India also lost as their property was seized by Pakistan government under similar act. The total value of the properties amounted to Rs 109 crores of assets. This loss was partially paid in the form of ex gratia to the individuals and enterprises under the Ex-gratia scheme announced by GoI on 15.3.1971.
History
The act was promulgated on 10th July 1968 encompassing whole India except for State of Jammu and Kashmir. The law promulgates many restrictions on the enemy properties which include defining property rights to enemies, custodians and transfer of such properties under the authorities. This was enacted with many orders from the Defense of India Rules, 1962 was continued even after the Act was passed by the Parliament mainly on account of security concerns. An amendment to replace the enemy property act was brought in September 1977. This was known as Enemy Property (Amendment) Act, 1977 which was imposed after repealing of Enemy Property (Amendment) Ordinance, 1977.

ENEMY PROPERTY ACT 1968 BECAME THE DEATH WARRANT FOR THOSE REFIGGES OF PAKISTAN, AS THEY WEREALOTTED THE LAND FOR THEIR LIVING AND INHABITATION BY CUSTODIAN GENERAL AND EVACUE PROPERTY ACT. THE NAMES THE INVADERS ARE VISUALISED BY THESE PEOPLE WHO STAYED HERE IN THIS COUNTRY. ABDUL KALAM AZAD, KIDWAI, JHOHAR, ZAKIR HUSSAIN, SALMAN KHURSHEED ,MUKHTI MOHHAMMAD SAID,  MADANI, SHAHABUDDIN, AUNTULLEY, AHMADI  POISONED HRD MINISTRY BY ATTRIBUTING AUTHERSHIP OF MONUMENT TO MUGHAL INVADERS , WHO WERE INDULDGED IN SEX AND VIOLENCE. THE JAI CHANDRA , RAVAN, KANSH, AND NEHRU GANDHI , UCBANARJEE, SACHCHAR, RANG NATH ,EVERY WHERE HELPED THEM.EVERY WHERE. GAZI SALAR MASOOD, RASOOD, AND OTHER INVADERS WHO KILLED NITAYA NAND SWAMI, AFZAL AND KASAB  ARE GIVEN VIP TREATMENT. IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE IT WAS SAID THAT AFTER PARTITION IF PAKISTAN PROVIDE ATTROCITIES UPON HINDU THAN WHAT IS THE SOLLUSION. IT WAS SAID BY JINNHA THAT ATTROCITIES WILL BE DONE UPON MUSLIMS IN HINDUSTAN. WHAT WAS DONE IN HINDUSTAN???? EVERY RAILWAY STATION IN BETWEEN THE RAILWAY LINES HAS A MAZAR, WHEREHINDUS BASTARD ARE PROVIDING OFFERING. TAJ MAHAL , AJMER , DHAI DIN KA MAKBARA ARE HAVING HIDDEN SHIVA TEMPLE. WHEN HINDUS LIKE RANA PRATAP, SHIVA JI, BHAGAT SINGH AND LADY LIKE RANI LAXMI BAIWILL TAKE THE BIRTH??? IT WILL BE TOO LATE. PROTECT NARENDRA MODI WHO IS FACING ATTROCITIES COMMITTED BY SUPREME COURT FIRSTLLY IN FALSE ZAHIRA CASE AND NOW IN SHOHRABUDDIN ENCOUNTER CASE. THESE TRAITORS MUST NOT BE KILLED , BUT BE GIVEN ROYAL TREATMENT LIKE AFZAL, KASHAB.
COMING TO LOCUNA ENJOYED BY THESE TRAITORS KILLING INNOCENT BHARTIYA, NOW THIS COUNTRY PROPERTY IS GIVEN TO THESE PAKISTANI NATIONALISTS RELATIVES, WHO GOT THEMSELVES ENROLED AS CITIZEN WITH THE HELP OF CORRUPT OFFICIAL TO INCREASE VOTE BANK. WHAT BJP IS DOING IN PARLIAMENT . THE MIGRATION OF PAKISTANI AND BANGLA DESH MILITANTS HAS BEEN DONE IN CONNIVANCE OF THESE JAI CHANDRA , RAVAN, KANSH RULING OUR NATION. KASMIRI PANDIT , WHO GENERATED THE PROBLEM OF KASHMIRI JULAHES WERE FIRSTLY OUSTED BY THEM.
HOME MINISTRY THROUGH P. CHIDAMBARAM ON THE BEHEST OF SALMAN KHURSHID IS GOING TO REPLACE THIS ORDINANCE. PREVIOUSLY MAN MOHAN SAID TO THESE PROPAKISTANI DELEGATION THATHAT IT WILL NOT BE CONVERTED TO THE ACT. NOW ABOUT 1468 IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IN UTTAR PRADESH, 351PROPERTY IN WEST BENGAL 66 PROPERTY IN DELHI, 63 IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IN GUJRAT, 40 PROPERTY IN BIHAR 21,IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IN ANDHRAPRADESH, 35 PROPERTY IN GOA, 25PROPERTY IN MAHARASTRA, 24 PROPERTY IN KERALA AND 93 PROPERTIES IN OTHER PARTS OF THE STATE ARE GIVEN BACK TO THESE MIGRANTS PAKISTANIS. SOME TIME THE ARGUMENTS ARE CONDUCTED AT ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT THAT PAKISTANI CAN FILE PETITION AND CLAIM THEIR PROPERTY AS THEY ARE NOT THE ENEMY. THESE PROPERTY VALUATION IS RS. 29400 CARORES AT PRESENT AND THEY WERE VESTED IN COSTODIAN AND ENEMY PROPERTY .
HAZ SUBSIDY, MINORITY STATUS, SPECIAL PRISION TO PAKISTANI AFZAL AND KASB MINORITY STATUS OF MORE THAN 50 % OF POPULATIONS TO MUSLIMS IN UTTAR PRADESH IS CONCESSION. ATTROCITIES UPON HINDUS THROUGH MFHUSSAIN PAINTING, HOMOSEXUALITY FROM COURT OF LAW BEGAM SHERVANI GETTING PADAM SHREE , KAIF GETTING PADAM SHREE AND SALMAN KHAN KILLING BLAKE BUCK WITHOUT ANY IMPRISONMENT DESPITE BEING CONVICTED BY TRIAL COURT AND SHAH RUKH KHAN IS INSERTING THE PAINT IN LONDON ON MFHUSSAIN DURGA POTRAIL AND EXPULSION OF TASLIMA NASHREEM ISTHE PREVILEGE TO MUSLIM BY SEEING SEPERATION OF KASHMIR IS THE AGENDA OF CONGRESS ,
ENEMY PROPERTY ACT 1968 (Amm.and Validation) Bill 2010 death warrant to nationalist CONGRESS PROOVING TO BE THE WORST THAN BIN KASIM, TUGLAQ, GAJHNAVI, GAURI AND AURANGZEB

Justice Pinaki Ghosh and Justice Shailendra Prasad Talukdar
Is conversion of a minor girl of 15 is valid in law? If not, then the conversion of minor girl Anita stands null and void in the court of law. So treating her marriage according to Muslim Marriage Act does not arise. Furthermore, eloping with a minor girl of 15 without the consent of her parents is a clear case of kidnapping, which is a highly criminal offence and how the honourable judges have overlooked this crime on the part of Shahidul before granting him the said anticipatory bail.President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad charged had been plotted from neighbouring Pakistan. The foreign ministry called in Pakistan's charge d'affaires over the bombing, which targeted one of the Islamic republic's most prestigious institutions in a region that has been a hotbed of Sunni insurgency against the Shiite Muslim regime., Union Minister for Minority Affairs, who is an Islamic leader and Congress politician from Maharashtra, is one of the most important pro-Jihadi in the Sonia lead Congress government in New Delhi. He is not merely the bridge between Sonia and Islamic mafia, but he is also the progenitor of the underworld Islamic mafia in Mumbai. Under his regime in Mumbai, the notorious Islamic mass murderer and mafia don Dawood Ibrahim was able to establish his criminal empire.. Equally misleading is his malicious attempt to depict peace loving Hindus as the chief architects of the Jihadi massacre.. Islam seems to lie behind a broad range of international disorders: suicide attacks, car bombings, military occupations, resistance struggles, riots, fatwas, jihads, guerrilla warfare, threatening videos, and 9/11 itself. Why are these things taking place? “Islam” seems to offer an instant and uncomplicated analytical touchstone, enabling us to make sense of today’s convulsive world. Indeed, for some neoconservatives, “Islam fascism” is now our sworn foe in a looming “World War III.”But indulge me for a moment. What if there were no such thing as Islam? India will go up in flames if Afzal hangs. The immediate past CM of J & K - Mufti Mohd Sayeed & his daughter Mehbooba Mufti (yes the same who was kidnapped & released in exchange for some notorious Kashmir militants who now move freely in the neighbouring country) says the sentence is too harsh! Too harsh my foot! He should have been shot in public.I have lost 18 members of my immediate family (ages ranging from 25 to 42) fighting insurgency in J & K, the Kargil war, anti insurgency operations in North East etc. There have been instances when sheer lack of political will has demoralised our troops at every stage. We had some secretaries & ministers who once ordered cow dung to be transported to our troops posted at Siachen/ Leh-Ladakh/ Kargil as food rations. This is a fact!!!!!!Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings.court sentenced a 19-year-old man to 10 years in jail for stabbing his sister to death in order to "cleanse the family honour," a judicial official said on Friday. The defendant turned himself in to police after killing his 22-year-old sister last year for many unexplained absences from home. Combating terrorism, now being discredited by intolerant fanatics and opportunists politician, under whom ,the elite   citizen, responsible for the executive functioning and the Investigating agencies responsible to protect the sovereign power of the State are knee down in anticipation of their posting for greasing their palm. This  is the greatest problem of the world. It has become the threat to the Nations, who encouraged it during the process of the struggle of cold war, with fellow nation. The god of hated filled cult having its mandate to get the rid of the world of proclaimed “infidels” and “heretics”, are themselves struggling against their own weaknesses The kingdom of Arabia was formulated on the principles, that this world rejected all type of injustice, violence, breach of peace, bloodshed, murder and plunder. Jihad was defined after the battle of Bard. It is written in the “Kitbag al Tauhid”. The tomb of Prophet Muhammad was virtually destroyed in 1803 at Medina and People Stripped the Kaba at Makah. Hindus are orphan in India as well as in overseas countries  Why is it so?Hindus are humilited in their own country and Hindus are suffered in Fiji,Malaysia,Tinidad,Sri Lanka,African countries and many other countries and have no support fron Government of India Why?  Because  secularism is the guiding principal since 1947 under Nehru-Gandhi' s Congress and its foreign-minority rule in India for most of 62 years and at present being ruled by Euro-Italian women called Sonia Maino Antonio  Gandhi  where the P.M. and his cabinet has more respect for this dynasty[ nasty] than the people and constitution of India. They take oath for the severeignty and integrity of India but since 15.08.1947 the have lost sovereignty and integrity of India. India's condition will be worse than Zimbabwe under the present UPA  and its allince of opportunists.What was supposed to be Independence in 1947 after centuries of savage and brutal treatment by Turks, Moguls and the British, condemned as “Kafirs” by Arab, Persian and Afghan MASTERS, not to speak of the Europeans, including the Portuguese, the French and the Dutch, besides the British, turned out to be PARTITION in which one third of India became Pakistan and reverted back to dark and savage Sharia Law. How are we to liberate the co-called Pakistanis from the agonising suffocating "Cage" of Koran? How?

Extravagance of Public Finance vis-à-vis curbing the power and duties of C&AG.

Extravagance of Public Finance vis-à-vis curbing the power and duties of C&AG.

The constitution of India provides that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal who shall not be removed from Office, except in the like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of Supreme Court. The term of appointment shall be for a period of 5 years and the condition of service and salary of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India shall be such as may be determined by Parliament by Law and until they are so determined, shall be as specified in the second schedule of the constitution. The Comptroller and Auditor General shall perform such duties and exercise such powers in relation to the accounts of the union and of the states and of any other authority or body as may be prescribed or under any law made by Parliament. The report of the Comptroller and Auditor General relating to the accounts so maintained of the union shall be submitted to the President who shall cause them to be laid before each house of Parliament . The report relating to the accounts of the states shall be submitted to the Governor who shall cause them to be laid before the legislature of the states.

That the present accounting system applicable to most Ministries and departments in essentially external to Financial management function in that the payment made by the treasuries and accounts are compiled by audit and accounts offices under the control of the Comptroller and Auditor General on the basis of initial and subsidiary accounts received by them from the treasuries. This system worked fairly well when Governmental business was limited. With the increase ion the volume and variety of Governmental business and the continual set-up of developmental outlays, this system has proved inadequate to the administration task.

The scheme of separation of accounts from audit was to be implemented in selective ministries e.g communication, civil aviation, tourism, industries and civil supplies w.e.f April 1976, where the expansion regarding the expenditures and its audit was felt to be providing certain constraint and thereby resulting into the delay in implementation of the schemes at the relevant time. However by the gradual increase of the power with these ministries, the similar laxity in relation to the procedural safeguard was further provided the other ministries resulting into the defeat of the very purposes for which the office of the Comptroller and Auditor General was given the power through checks and balances. The effect of the aforesaid process has resulted in the departmentalisation of union accounts enacted in 1976 and the transfer of personnel was given effect by the enforcement of the Act no 59 of 1976 from Indian Audit and Accounts departments which was earlier under the control of C.& AG to the newly formed department of Civil Accounts under the Controller General of Accounts under department of Expenditure ministry of Finance. In this manner the office of C& AG which was constituted under the scheme of the constitution of India to provide the restraint to the expenditure disproportionate from its own discretion by the relevant ministries was brought under the ministry of Finance and thereby giving the unbridle powers to the ministers and thereby overthrowing the constitutional mandate securing the safeguard over the whimsical expenditure. According to the legal opinion of the constitutional experts, the diversification of the financial powers to be utilised by the sole discretion of the bureaucrats without taking into consideration the Audit objections, which could have been made under the original constitutional scheme, was directly resulting into the notion of conferring the absolute power to the respective ministry. This was against the democratic, federal and republic set-up of our Constitution. The aforesaid concept of the parliamentarian democracy, providing the fraternity to an individual in preamble of the constitution, was an attack on its basic structure. This has led to an inadequate financial control which would have been benefited to the nation if such power were remained with C&AG in India

That it would be relevant to point out that the office of the Auditor General of India was created under the Government Of India Act 1935 for exercising the control over expenditure incurred by Central And State Governments and for proper accounting thereof in such forms and in such manner as may be prescribed by him and he was also responsible for rendering a complied account of receipt and expenditure to the Centre and State Governments and he was also required to submit report on the result of Audit in his Audit report to the Governor- General and

the Governor of the States for laying it before respective legislatures . That after coming over the constitution of India the Auditor General was designated as Comptroller Audit General of India under chapter V of the constitution.

Narendra Modi

Narendra Modi

SAVE INDIANS FROM CONGRESS ATTROCITIES : THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER , NO OTHER ...

SAVE INDIANS FROM CONGRESS ATTROCITIES : THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER , NO OTHER ...: THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER, NO OTHER THAN Smt. SONIA GANDHI Ms.Sonia Gandhi has also fully utilized the martyrdom of her h...

SAVE INDIANS FROM CONGRESS ATTROCITIES : THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER , NO OTHER ...

SAVE INDIANS FROM CONGRESS ATTROCITIES : THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER , NO OTHER ...: THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER, NO OTHER THAN Smt. SONIA GANDHI Ms.Sonia Gandhi has also fully utilized the martyrdom of her h...

Hangout with Shri Narendra Modi

The Malegaon terror attacks Lt. Colonel Purohit, wherein he emerges not as a terrorist mastermind but as an over-zealous intelligence officer.

The Malegaon terror attacks are back in the headlines sparked by the findings of an army court of inquiry instituted to probe the role of Lt Colonel Prasad Purohit, one of the key accused in the case. He was arrested on 5 November, 2008, nearly two months after the blast by the Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad, along with other members of the Hindu right-wing organisation, Abhinav Bharat.

The army official was arrested in 2008 and has been in jail since then. Screen grab from CNN IBN

The results of the military inquiry – obtained by Outlook  – paint a different picture of Purohit, wherein he emerges not as a terrorist mastermind but as an over-zealous intelligence officer. Each of the 59 witnesses called by the military panel describe a man with a proven track record of infiltrating extremist organizations in the past – including SIMI, Tabliq-e-jamal, and Naxal organisations [Read the Outlook exclusive here]:

This version is at odds with the ATS’s allegation of Purohit being Abhinav Bharat’s leader. In the picture that emerges from the COI testimonies, Sudhakar [Chaturvedi], currently an accused in the case, worked for Abhinav Bharat and kept feeding Purohit inputs on the right-wing group’s movements during the latter’s tenure as an intelligence officer of the Deolali unit in Maharashtra. Gradually, he became a key source and shortcut for Purohit to infiltrate right-wing groups. After Purohit was posted to Pachmarhi in Madhya Pradesh, he handed over the “source” to his unit, handled for a short while by the now retired Subedar Pawar.

There is also a significant paper trail that reveals Purohit had indeed filed reports based on his insider sources. The key among these is information he sent to senior intelligence officers in mid October on the Malegaon blasts, naming Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Indresh Kumar. The irony, of course, is that three weeks later, the ATS arrested not just Thakur and Kumar, but also Purohit himself as the prime suspects in the case.

As today’s Times of India points out, the findings of the COI put the NIA’s case against Purohit in serious jeopardy. Much of the evidence – conversations and close relationships with the key accused – can now be explained as part of his undercover work. There is no direct proof of his participation in the execution of the blasts themselves:

On two key evidential fronts — of that of RDX procurement and financial assistance — agencies are still floundering. While Purohit has been accused of stealing 60 kg RDX from J&K while he was posted there and passing it on to the bomb planters, the trail has not been established. Even the financial assistance routed through Purohit has stopped at Abhinav Bharat and does not lead to the actual conspiracy.

But that does not mean Purohit’s association with Abhinav Bharat was entirely innocent. Unlike his previous undercover work with SIMI et al, he has acknowledged an ideological “association” with an extremist organization of which he was a trustee.

In his first-ever interview with Outlook, when asked if he is in trouble because of his own rightwing views, Purohit is evasive: “This is a tricky question, involving both the army services and subjudice matters. I won’t be able to comment on this.” But he later adds: “Having a particular ideology does not make me a terrorist or anti-national.”

Pressed on his “explosive” conversations with co-accused Dayanand Pandey where he talks about a “Hindu Rashtra,” Purohit replies:

Being an intelligence officer or even as a civilian I am allowed to talk to people. Nothing bars me from talking to anyone. You must be having those transcripts. Have you heard or read anywhere in those transcripts people talking or discussing the Malegaon blast for which I have been behind bars for three-and-a-half years? If people don’t understand what infiltration is, it is a sorry state of affairs.

In that one answer, Purohit offers two different explanations: one, he has the right to hold rightwing views, which are irrelevant if there is no proof of his participation in the blasts; two, the rhetoric was part of his infiltration tactics and do not reflect his personal views.

And also this: Would he be able to offer this hair-splitting defense as a Muslim intelligence officer working undercover with a Muslim extremist organization accused of terrorist acts?

Purohit’s personal right-wing sympathies may not be evidence of guilt in the Malegaon case, but it does not let him off the hook with the COI, where he is charged of “allegedly being a member of Abhinav Bharat, an organisation not recognised by the armed forces of the Union.”

The Outlook piece also raises another unanswered question: “If Lt Col Purohit was doing only what his job demanded, why did the army hand him over to the ATS so quickly?”

Security expert B Raman offers one possible answer in the Eurasian Review. Arguing that Purohit’s defense is likely to land the army in big, big trouble, he writes:

The military intelligence is authorised to collect tactical intelligence through human and technical means in areas where the Army has a counter-insurgency role as in Jammu & Kashmir and the North-East. In areas where it has no counter-insurgency role, it is not permissible for the military intelligence to collect intelligence through any means—particularly through the penetration of Indian organisations run by Indian citizens…

It appears to me that the military intelligence has so far avoided coming to the defence of Purohit in the case under investigation previously by the Mumbai Police and now by the NIA due to worries that if it did so, it could amount to its admitting its illegal actions in mounting intelligence operations against Indian citizens by penetrating Indian organisations.

The Malegaon case made headlines for being the first ever case of saffron terrorism. But it may become memorable for raising as many questions about the role of the military as it does of the accused.