SUPERIOR COMMAND Vs RIGHT OF REBELLION
"Yadyapy ete na pasyanti
lobhopahanta-cetasah
Kula-ksaya-krtam Dosam
Mitra-drohe ca patakam
katham na jneyam asmabhih
Papad asman nivastitum
Kula-ksaya krtam Dosam,
Prapasyadbhir Janardana."
"Even if these people, with
minds blinded by greed, perceive no evil in destroying their own race and no
sin by treason to friends, why should not we, O Krishna, who se clearly the sin
accruing form the destruction of one's family, things of turning away from this
crime?
"Atha cet tvam imam
dharmyam,
Sangramam na karisyasi,
tatah svadharmam kirtimca,
Hitva papam avapsyasi."
"Now if you refuse to fight
this righteous war, then shrinking your duty and losing your reputation, you
will incur sin."
"Hato va prapasyasi svargam,
jitva va bhoksyase mahim,
Tasmad uttistha kaunteya,
yudhay krita nisc-ayah."
"Die and you will heaven; conquer, and you enjoy sovereignty of
the earth, therefore stand-up, Arjuna, determined to fight."
"He who having sworn by
solemn oath at his coronation to protect the people from wrongful oppression
fail to do so shall be slain as a mad dog”.( MAHABHARAT)
Politics is now regarded as the
art of obtaining power and governing the masses through any means irrespective
of objectivity towards its ends. The causality of intellectual honesty and lack
of understandability with detachment are the result of confrontation and
conflict of mutual interest. Superiority
over the command between rival groups resulting in the Cold War. Politics war
considered to be the branch of ethics, but now it is a powerful brut force of
human stupidity greed, jealousy and malice towards fellow citizens. These forces sit over the command of the
people. Man has many enemies such as lion, wolves, serpents, but is worst enemy
is considered to be his own species with the man power having brutality and
destruction at there commands. Mankind
has now arrived at crisis on account of its own fate, ignorance and
superstition may co-ordinate with these forces which are considered to be the
greatest enemy of civilisation. It has
come to stand still by the cumulative compulsion of divisive forces fighting
with each other with materialistic approach towards life.
Mutual love and affection with
sympathy towards human cause is based on ethics and not on the theory of give
and take. This is based on co-ordination
and spiritual power of the individual. Our potential may provide a guide line
for success. In the recent time we have
visualised that those politicians, who were indulged in accumulating the wealth
without providing any consideration for justification of their action, they
have undergone through a great mental agony, frustration, discomfiture and
disappointment as those people who have provided their best co-ordination to
drag these politicians for monetary considerations; they have completely ruined
the carrier and reputation due to their criminal prosecution launched by the
investigation authorities on the motivation of judicial accountability and the
principle of trusty hood as one of the statutory obligation caste upon these
custodian’s of power.
Marshal Stalin declared during
world war "It would be ludicrous to identify the Hitler's clique with
German people with the German State. The experience of history shows that
Hitler's come and go, but the German people and the German State live on.
President Roosevelt said - " I should be false to the very foundation of
my religious and political conviction if I should ever relinquish the hope and
even the faith -- that in all people without exception these lives some
instinct for truth, some attraction towards justice and some passion for the
people. Buried as they may be under the
brutal regime."
In anxiety to punish and disable
Germany, the allied Powers flung her into abyssal of economic despair after the
first World war, from where emerged the demon of Nazism. They drove them to the
frenzy by injustice and then we make that excuse for not redressing the wrong.
Hitler became Chancellor of Third Reich in January, 1933. He re-armed Germany first secretly and then
openly. He influenced the plebiscite which resulting in an overwhelming
majority for return of Saar to Germany.
He denounced the military classes of the Versailles treaty and
introduced, conscription in March, 1935.
He marched into demilitarised shine land zone in 1936. He threw himself
on the side of France in Spain-Britain adopted the policy of
non-intervention. Hitler grew strength
and confidence to fight against the atrocities committed by allied forces
during the first World war against Germany.
The result as that that Austria brought back to the German provinces for
which even Bismarck had not courage to speak.
The campaign started for liberation of Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia,
a sovereign state bound by ties of treaty and friendship of Great Britain,
France and Soviet Russia. This was
followed by seizure of memel and defacto annexation of still free Czech
territories. People grew furious. The
occupation of Prague lead to the war.
Till this period Hitler was led to believe that his policies and
programme was not likely to a arouse the hostility of Great Britain and
France. This has ultimately led to the
second world war resulting into the loss of millions life and destruction
through aggressive ambitions, which could have averted, if the allied forces
have exercised their right of rebellion against the superior command. There would have not been any number. Trial and destruction of humanity by dropping
two atom bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki to demonstrate the evil desire of
domination by Americans at the end of the war.
Churchil spoke with enthusiasm of
Mussolini's " Gentle and simple bearing " whole- heartedly from start
to finish in the triumphant struggle against leninism on 20th January,
1927. The Italian system was appreciated
as being founded on two rocks:- (i) The separation of church and state; and
(ii) The right of labour. The
Churchill's party defeat after Second World War a symbolic protest against
appeasement of Nazi Germany and the opposite to Soviet Russia.
Japan was ally of Britain and
France. Japan invaded manchuria. No single government felt that it as an
attempt against the reign of law among nations.
Secretary of state for India said Japan has got a very powerful case
based on fundamental realities against continual aggression of fundamental
realities against continual aggression of vigorous, Chinese nationalism. This was based on conscience decision by
which the British were ruling in India. Japan acquired manchuria and Korea and
continued to remain great friend of Great Britain till Japan had not joined
Germany.
The western democracies were not
condemned to the imperialist aggression of Germany. Italy and Japan due to the reason as these
countries were saddle in the same boat till the people asserted their rights
and forced them to resist. No country
was free from sickness of selfish nationalism. The indisputable guilt of excess
power should not blind us to the fact to cast the first stone with clear conscience. If we tolerate wrong doing for long; we
become responsible for it.
The loud complaints were mode
against Germany when she launched the flying bomb and it was condemned as an
" Instrument of blind malice."
"An aimless destroyer."
What about colossal violation of by Americans by dropping Atomic Bomb
claimed 2,44,000 out of 2,50,000 population of the Hiroshima. All living
things, human and animal in Hiroshima were literally shrouded to death by the
Atomic Bombs. Nagasaki suffered equally
terrible losses. Both cities were a disastrous ruin. It was not dropped in Europe, but in Asia
purposely by Americans. Although the
poisonous gas was not used in the Second World War, but the American built
London ship " Empire simba" of 5691 tonnes scuttled with 8000 tonnes
of poison gas held in readiness which left a little scottish harbour to said
out into the Atlantic Ocean. But for
atomic bomb there was not fear of retaliation as the excess power had no
equivalent and for it. The obvious
difference between war and massacre is just here. The war is fought the
massacre is merely suffered. We do not make war on people who do not fight and
retaliate. We can only murder them, killing unarmed civilians by raining death
on them from the clouds is condemned as contemptible crime. It is not war.
President Truman under the grab
of Japan's treacherous attack on pearl harbour justified the use of second Atom
Bomb and that despotic contemptible criminal of humanity and further threatened
to go on until Japan and her people either surrendered or were completely
destroyed.
The Christian nations were using
a licence to use there weapons under the validity of plea with an implied
motive to attain the superiority over innocent Asian citizens; we have just
massacre without retaliation of which
even barbarous nation would have ashamed while Germans replied to obey
the command of their superior officers in a Nuremberg trial were given
punishments should Americans be spared from the tremendous cruelties which
innocent citizens have suffered ?
Whether the future generation bound to suffer due to the effect of
radiation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki can forgive such crime ? Once arms are being taken up all the
reverence for divine or Human law were thrown away as they have got a license to commit all the crimes without restraint.
Whether it was a war of civilisation against barbarism ? Whether Americans were fighting for moral and
not for metalistic approach? This grim
ferocious epoch with vast horrors and miseries were inflicted by nations who
claimed themselves to be the most civilised. The victorious allies were
forgiven all compatible massacre of Japanese and humanity as justification
urged for a military necessity. The
obliteration without previous warning to human being living at Hiroshima and
Nagasaki was a crime against the civilisation and there was no parallel to this
crime in both the world wars. The fundamentalist of Nazi's slogan for military
necessity justifying horrible and barbaric methods were left for behind by the
Americans. The war which starts with noble object of fighting brute forces, bad
faith, injustice, oppression and persecution ended by the outrage on humanity
and civilisation. Moral superiority were
no where to get the victory over Axis power.
The defeated nations be treated in the spirit of tolerance, sympathy and
goodwill and not in the spirit of distress, malice or hatred.
The British government cannot
escape from the responsibility of deaths from 15-20 lakh of people living in
India, a figure higher that the losses of lives of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
people, a figure higher than the losses of whole British Common wealth in war
over total period of 6 years which was estimated to be the only about 11 lakhs.
In-spite of British rule in India over 150 years, that could not save the
civilisations due to their imperialism policy.
The representatives of three big power Soviet Russia, United States and
United Kingdom due to their respective rivalries were totally disappeared to
fought against the Axis power, but the outcome of the war has resulted into the
reproduction of another kind of Cold War based on economic censor and military
superiority. The recommendation of the
present Truman for retaining the Atom Bombs by the Great Britain and United
States for the alleged protection of the civilisation and will be used for
keeping the peace was mere slogan. It
was said that the same will not be revealed to Russian. The whole conception was fantastic. Soon Russian speaking on October Revolution
anniversary celebration in Moscow declared that " We too shall have Atomic
energy and many other things."
General Degaulle, then Foreign
Minister of France declared that the Ruineland be again placed under the joint
strategic of military and political
security of France, Belgium, Holland and Britain, It should be once for
all be cut-off from Germany in such a way that its inhabitants should realise
that their future did not live with Germany.
If nation whose welfare depended on Ruler coal and industry imposed on
international regime, some restriction than the rest of the Germany would
certainly not be as powerful or rich as Germany would certainly not be as
powerful or as rich as before and would never again be a danger because control
over the ruler meant control of German industry.
The same is the fate of Indian
continents given by the British imperialism through their diplomacy and
enshrined policy of divide and rule in the state of partition in of Indian
continents. About 6 lakh Indian people
lost their homes. Three successive battles were on the motherland and still
more to be witnessed if the good sense will not prevail over vitious designs of
imperialism. British’s who still
maintain their supremacy with remote control having significant interference
from our leadership. Recently the
Americans aggressive bombardment on Korea, Vietnam and Iraq and thereby
exploring the natural resources including petroleum products under the
protective umbrella over Kuwait is the alarming signal for military aggression
by the Americans. The disintegration of
existence of U.S.S.R and economic confrontation with China may further suggest
that the land on which the future war will be fought, will be of Asians most
probably belonging to the land of Indian continents. The economic blockade to China and
insurrection of multinationals in India continents may prove the substantial
evidence for aggressive bombardment by the imperialism Americans. Our existence
may be on stake as being visualised after second world war over the Japanese
cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let us
try to avert through constant
constructive role for strengthening the national unity and if possible making a
confederation of United States of Indian continents. The unified Germany is the recent example of
such unification of two portions of a great nation.
Let us visualise the impact of
broad cast made by the President Truman on his return from Potsdam
"America will maintain the basis necessary for be complete protection of
our interests and of world peace (as being visualised by aggressive bombardment
over Hiroshima and Nagasaki; Vietnam and recently in Iraq). We may acquire any
other basis which our military experts deem to be essential for our protection
(the production which was done by dropping two Atom bombs against the attack of
Japanese on Pearl harbour), a policy of military imperialism. Let us not forget that we are fighting for
peace and for the welfare of mankind (slogan and false propaganda is
further aggravate the militants
aggressive policies). The strategical
interest of America must be deemed to be extended upto Mediterranean, outside
the site to establish the necessary
basis for our own protection. We look
for nothing which belong to any other Power- We seek to use our military
strength solely to preserve the peace of the world, for we knew that it is the
only way to make our own freedom secure."
The collapse of Soviet Union, the
spectacular economic growth of China as most important power in international
system after Americans and the drifts towards a confrontation shaping the dynamics
of Cold War is the fresh indication of such policy being adhered to by the
Americans in the recent future. China
has now emerging as superpower and the Clinton's assertion on of no
confrontation policy may be provided with the stagnation over the Americans
trade expansion policy, the arm's control establishment and thereby losing the
popular support for the presidential candidature due to such policy and
therefore the Americans have started realising the issues like expulsion of
Dalai Lama, the freedom of Tibetan people and demonstrating it for
international independence, identity of American alliance with military
co-operation from Japan, Australia and South Korea.
This has further broadened the
possible aggression by Americans and thereby providing uncertain strategic
environment in Asia. It has to be kept in mind that the second world war was
not the consequence of German aggressive policies of expansion of their
strategic territorial superiority, but it was also the outcome of providing
economic censor in Rhinland as a retaliation to the German attack during the
first world war.
The suffering from the domination
of Germany and Japan was fought while the imperial power do not like to get off
the backs and cause of the depended people for
the independence-Racial pride is not a creation of Nazi's. President Roosevelt said. "Radical
strife renders us suspect abroad. Man of all races black, white, Brown and
yellow fight beside us for freedom. We
cannot stand before the world as champion of oppressed people unless we
practice as well as preach the principles of democracy for all men. Race prejudice and radically justified
injustices reveal the contrast between the promise and the performance of
imperial power. Britain could not have
defended herself without help of Indians in the second world war--- what
has these British’s given to the Indian
people? The miseries our people may
visualised by observing the apathy and thereby giving promotion to the
fundamentalist to Muslims and the political aspirants Indians to see the
creation of two nation theory. They cannot remove evil by announcing
ideals."
Stalin in November, 1941 declared
"We have not nor can we have such war aims as the seizure of foreign
territories or the conquest of other people's irrespective of whether European
people's territory or Asiatic people's territories are concerned. We have not nor can we have such aims as
imposition of our will and our regime on Slavic and other enslaved people of
Europe who are waiting for help. Our aim
is to help these people in their struggle for the liberation from Hitler's
tyranny and then to accord them the possibility of arranging their own lives on
their own lands as they see fit with absolute freedom."
The people of a week and backward
country, however strong and healthy they might be, could only serve to be made
examples of or as witnesses of such
futile spectacles; and it was not necessarily deplorable if many of them
dies of prolong illness. The most
important thing is to change there spirit. The real tragedy is to life up their voice
among the living and meet with no response; neither approval nor opposition,
just as if they are stranded in a boundless desert completely at loss.
Imagine an iron house having not
a single window and virtually indestructible, with all its inmates sound asleep
and about to die of suffocation. Dying
in their sleep they would not feel the pain of death. Now if now you raise a shout to wake a few of
the lighter sleepers, making these unfortunate few suffer the agony of
irrevocable death, do we really think we're doing them a good turn?
It is true that there is no hope
of destroying the iron house. But still
one can not blot out hope, for hope belongs to the futures.
There is no refutation of
affirmation of the affirmation of faith clear day light swallowed up the lamp
light. If we can persuade our citizens the American disastrous consequences of
confrontation with imperialistic policy of expansion and thereby unified
together to avoid these fundamentalists forces to raise their heads for
forthcoming confrontation through collusion with each other, we hope we are
discharging or obligations to serve the nation.
Unless progressive intellectuals
with the capacity to fight and make their consistent and sustained efforts to
sponsor and extend the cause of humanity by fighting with the evil design of
divisive forces dominating over the arena of present political set-up of our
nation, nothing can be achieved from the emancipation from the prevailing
maladies and thereby resulting into the survivability of our civilisation in
the complete darkness for future generation.
Nature has created men not to war
but to friendship, not to destruction but to health, not to wrong but to kind
and benevolence. Nature has armed the
beasts with armours. Man alone left
fourth naked, week, tender with the most soft flesh and smooth skin do better
to be knitted together be the leagues and conventions.
Our politicians have yet to start
thinking of making and enacting laws against the moral crime as one of the
sociological need felt to amend on the ethical schools of law. The law is not to be compared to a venerable
antique, to be taken down, dusted admired and put back on the shelf moral
damage is more terrible. Politicians
from the changes like chameleons. Thus the politically motivated sub-version of
the popular mandate is now a common phenomenon.
Thus the law can not be the devoid of morality. The courts of law are the proverbial to the
temple of justice. Tilting the balance
of justice or sales of justice by weight of coin is the very antithesis of
justice. Are the judges are indispensable?
If we tolerate them like that of imperial power having their superior
commands over the whelmn of the people, we are also protecting that aggressive
policies of imperialism over the innocent victim. We cannot dispense with such a responsibility
one has to fight for having a command over the whelmn of affairs in the
country, otherwise we may witness the same fate of massacre committed over the
defenceless citizens and thereby committing the greatest sin against the
civilisation and humanity. In the system
where the law protect the corrupt politicians and judicial pronouncements
keeping justice inaccessible to the poor and downtrodden, a class of lawyer who
stood in forefront of national struggle offered the supreme sacrifice and
untold miseries for the cause of independence should also rise the occasion and
earn a probation and leisure had their command.
Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer in his
book " Our courts on trial" while dealing with the heading
"Justice thyself" has observed:- " The unbecoming of judicial
misdemeanour, what was once a whisper, the rumour about Judges and there
delinquencies has now become a conviction of their guilt among social realities,
communalism and favouritism. We want our
judges to be a good man, not "boneless wonders" and bundles of bias,
nor wheeler-dealers of justice who stoop to conquer why should turn to
publicity merchant cultivate constituencies. Political and judicial
influence. Communist and economically
powerful centre plead with ministers for monetary and other bonanzas? Why do they run after Chief Minister for posh
house, sites at nominal prices as happened in Bombay and Chandigarh. Now that judges are banned from foreign
hospitality without central approval, each judicial travel is becoming a
ministerial favour". "The
present generation of judges should not preside over the liquidation of the
great heritage. We still have great
hope, we still have great confidence in courts but the court down has begin and
a national discussion among state men in politics and lawyers and scholars in
social sciences is long over due to save the judges from themselves is now
a critical need". "If the judicial process fails, people's
sense of justice, violence fills the victim on the streets, not the courts,
settle disputes."
Thus the solution lies in passing
the suitable structures by the superior courted even disciplinary action to the
departmental proceedings for every wrong judgement given by the person
preceding over the court of law is the need of the time. The common man seeks realisation of his
aspiration in no sphere of public life.
The promise of better tomorrow has conveniently forgotten with a leaf
turning and today there is a burning danger that the people will work out their
destiny through the compelled cult of their own "Dirty Hands".
Our constitutional duties
prudence appears to be nothing but accommodation, but ours it meant Settlement
in regard to show shoe economic progress of our society. So I has no Meaning for millions, I will not
know how to into idea and fullest ideas as.
Mutual district, declared and in fight is on the Increase. National discipline, co-ordination and
co-operative of words have begun that casualties in the process. Strikes,
Gherao’s and agitation by the
opportunist have become a common menace and bureaucracy and red tapism are well
trenched in the administration of
Service enshrined and guaranteed as a alleged to be constitutionally recognised. A well organised class is paralysing the
entire administration resulting in complete departure of the cultural heritage
with the generation of hatred and rampant corruption throughout in the process of administration. The mind is the restless bird, the more it
gets the more it wants and still remains dissatisfied except is being
controlled in proper discipline and restrictions which are completely in the present set up of administration.
Laws are the aggregate of rules
representing the collective wisdom of community and therefore applied universally according to the circumstances
conditions and requirements of the nation universally for the common human
benefit of the people’s welfare and therefore made applicable for the strict enforcement of justice with the changing
requirement and sanctity of the rule of
law. Doubt perishes the man while apathy to a particular situation
ruined the civilisation.
Law and order to satisfy the
needs of fast changing society has to be involved in order to meet out the
challenges instead of remaining static. Thus the judicial thinking to be constructed by the references which would
adequately dealt with the new problems and therefore we no longer need the
clutches of foreign legal system. It has
to be secured through the process of law.
That collective interest of the community so that parties do not lose
faith in the institution and thereby indulge in private retribution is the
prime objective of the legal order. The procedural safeguard should commensurate
with the sweep of power . The wider the power, the greater than need for
restraint in its exercise and correspondingly, more liberal construction of our procedural safeguard envisaged by statute.
Laws are the aggregate of rules
representing is the collective wisdom of community and therefore applied
universally according to the circumstances and conditions and requirement of
the nation universally for the common human benefit of people's welfare and
therefore made applicable for the strict enforcement of justice with the
changing requirement and sanctity of the rule of law. Doubt perishes the man while apathy to a
particular situation ruin the civilisation.
Law in order to satisfy the needs
of fast changing society has to be evolved in order to meet out the challenges
instead of remaining static. Thus the
judicial thinking to be constructed by reference which would adequately deal
with the new problems and therefore we no longer need the crutches of foreign
legal system. It has to be secured
through the process of law. The
collective interest of the community so that parties do not lose faith in the
institution and thereby indulge in private retribution is the prime objective
of the legal order. The procedural
safeguards should commensurate with the sweep of power. The wider the power, the greater the
need for restraint in its exercise and correspondingly, more liberal the
construction of procedural safeguards envisaged by the statute .
An independent and honest
judiciary is sine qua non for rule of law.
It is imperative to protect the honest officers from motivated
misconceived complaints made by
unscrupulous litigants while on the
other hand infallibility is an unreliable ideals, correctness is often a matter
of opinion. Thus ability to anticipate
the fallibility is the gift of a prophecy consideration of finality are subject to the paramount of justice but the
remedial action must be appropriate upon which the administration of justice
may rest. Thus the law can not afford
any favourite other than truth. Life of
law is not logic; it has been experienced however logic may not be ignored when experience is silent.
There has been erosion of faith
in the dignity of the court and in the majesty of the law. The procedural wrangle is eroding the faith
in our judicial system and one must introvert turn the search light over the
process of deterioration inwardly.
Therefore, the law must be definite and such as basic postulate is the requirements of the
consistency in judicial decision making process and at the same time, there is
the need for foreign flexibility. No straight jacket formula can be laid down
for judicial functioning. The concept of
public accountability of the judicial system and the professional competency
with ability to promote the justice is perhaps overdue and the courts are ill
equipped to speculate and seldom at contrary to democratic principles. Values in public life have undergone serious
erosion during last few decades what was unheard is a common talk of the day. The new value orientation has undergone in
our culture and we are at the threshold of the cross roads of these
values. This is a difficult situation.
One makes Law legal only by
giving its operation . The consent of one's conscience. A moral obligation to disobey is not less
compelling merely because an individual is powerless and that his disobedience
may lead to punishment through powerful
despotic monarch. It is always electoral
of pre-medication to adopt justice as synonymous to law, which may be the
command of the stranger, but the humanity and conscience will always be prone
to launch a protest through expression against such command of law who has no
sanctity of justice behind it. The
problem of obedience of unjust law is the root cause for a right to right to
rebellion and delicate balance is being observed in the history of
civilisation. The position of soldier
under section 41 of the Army Act, 1950 as making disobedience to unjust immoral
offence is in practice difficult to tackle as being liable to be shot at by a
court martial and if he disobeys to be
hanged by a judge. There is a concurrent
conflicting demands of choosing either of the two. The discipline and of supremacy of law. It is difficult to examine and being aware of
a illegality of the order and therefore law contrives an objective test.
The Nuremberg trial has further declared
that Nazis law and order of dictator must confirm to minimum morality. If it does not stand this test, the
disobedience to unjust command will not often the discipline and rule of law
will prevail.
Resistance to oppression is the
consequence of other rights. When the
government violates the rights of the people, insurrection for the people and for each portion of the
people, the most sacred of all rights and the most indispensable of all duties.
Abraham Lincon’s famous slogan
“Government for the people ,by the people and of the people means that the
people can exercise their constitutional rights and revolutionary rights to
dismember and overthrow the government.
Thus rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Whenever any government becomes destructive
of certain inalienable rights of life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness, the people have the right to alter or abolish
it. The abuses and usurpation design to
reduce the existence of the individual and to act like absolute despotism, it
is the right and the duty to throw of such government and provide security to
the citizens.
The rebellion against government
is further justified when the majority of the people are oppressed by a
despotic minority and then it becomes a moral duty of men who love liberty not
to permit any moral rights to rebel against the majority. Practice of non-violent methods of rebellion
as a means to end tyranny has been justified
by our founder father but tyranny which
makes reforms impossible is difficult to be tackled down and in that situation
only the public opinion can safeguard the interest of the society.
The obligation to obey the law is
always linked with the question of justification for the natural outburst
with the right to revolution. The ultimate raison de etre for you social
discipline is reconcile apparently with conflicting claim of liberty and
law. The justification to obey the law
through civil disobedience involves conscious disapproval of government's
action. The other factor of disobedience
is through non-enforcement of the
sovereign power of imposition of tax law and when ever the protest has the
justification for not agreeable as unable to conscience to obey it.
The peace and tranquillity of the realm is always supreme as such
violent emotion is unwarranted by moral law .Socrates, who searched into things under the earth and in
heaven and therefore the youth refused
to hold his tongue and prepared that as he realised that law applies with equal
force to all to maintain ordered society
and in order to resist against. Unjust
law are must not to being afraid of being incurred in punishment for
disobedience, if his conscience permit him to do so.
Recent events have revealed the
damage of letting ashore on body politics
to fester for to long, the
solution must be consistent with the unity of the country and national interest
and not on as can result in claim of reaction detrimental to those interest.Despite
the enduring the assurance by every political party in the parliamentary
democracy for country’s stability progress and radical reform, there is a
complete social disruption. Sometime there is ideological compatibility due to
personality cult and dynasty rule over primitive society but when there starts
inherent contradictions and ego concentric personality clashes, the country
stability ,progress and radical reform comes to ignominiously halt.
Socialism is to social justice ,
what ritual is to religion and Dogma is to the truth. Our present politicians has imposed so called
mindless sociological arrangement on the nation under the garb of socialism which has held in thrall the people
endeavour and enterprise resulting in the transfer of wealth from the
honest to dishonest opportunist, merit
to the demerit; quality with the
quantity and justice with injustice in the guise of giving social protection. This is the reason that 231 public-sector
enterprises run by Union government and 636 by the state government of extracting the material
resources from public exchequer realising exorbitant price from India's
doctrines socialism. If the politicians
are actually concerned and they should have provided the financial security to
the backward classes as to enable them to survive by distribution of resources
with a logical distributive justice.
There is only quantitative growth without quantitative developments. The
influential politicians who preferred to let socialism remain the opiate the people and
of whom it can be truly said that if the ignorance is the bliss they
should be happiest men alive. Gandhi ji
said “Economics that hurts the moral well-being of individuals or nation is
immoral and therefore, sinful . True
economics never militate against highest ethical standards, just as all true
ethics to be worth of its name just at
the same be also good economics. An
economics that inculcates worship and enables the strong, to mass wealth of the expenses of the weak is a false and
dismal science. It spell death true economics on the other hand stands for social
justice, it promotes the good of all equally including the weakest and is
indispensable for decent life. Gandhi ji
told “I do not believe that multiplication of wants and machinery and contrives
to supply them is taking the world
single step nearer its goal ……a
wholeheartedly detests with. This met
desire to destroy the distance and time, to increase animal appetites and go to
the ends of the earth in the search of their satisfaction. If modern civilisation stands for all this
and I have understood to do so I call it Satanic” .
“A civilisation, in real sense of
the term consists not in the
multiplication but in deliberate and voluntary reduction of wants.
“Industrialisation on a mast
scale would necessarily lead to passive or active exploitation of the villagers as a problem of corruption and
marketing come in. Nothing should be
allowed to be produced by the cities which can equally well be produced by
villagers. The proper function of the
cities is to serve as clearing houses for village products. Here are more hands
than required for the work and therefore the problem is how to utilise the idle
hours, they will render unemployed. The
concentration of production and distribution in few hands privilege
oriented monopoly. The
industrialisation must not deprive people from environment, must but must in
village artisan to reduce his drudgery and improve his efficiency”.
This is the
answer to the concentration
industrialisation in the cities having no air to breathe at Delhi 460 S.P.M
level ,Calcutta 460 S.P.M level 350 S.P.M level each. Justice H.R. Khanna, when appointed as commission of
inquiry in the year 1967 in respect of the matter relating to the charge of corruption against
the minister’s of Orrisa including three Chief ministers, one of whom
was Biju Patnaik while dealing with 70 charges of corruption levelled against
them, was faced a situation dealing with the arguments advanced on behalf of
two ex chief ministers, that there was no prescribed code of conduct for the
ministers to held them guilty of impropriety, that ministers cannot use their
officer or allow them to be used for furthering the business interest of his
family members to have commercial dealing with the State as they themselves
never passed orders in respect of such transactions. Justice Khanna observed that a person on
being a minister becomes the custodian
of the public interest. Thus he
should so formulate his politics and his
activities that there is no possibility of the clash between his personal
interest and the public interest. The
role of minister has got to be that of pioneer
rather than a pirate, of the public to sentinel rather than
of self seeks of one dedicated to
the public cause and not one obsessed with the desire of personal gain --
-- what is needed is a climate of strong
public opinion where in none may dare to
deviate from the path of rectitude . Law
can punish only occasional lapses
quoting a classic passage of judge hand. “ I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon our constitution,
upon laws and upon courts. These are false
hopes liberty lies in the hearts of men and women. When it dies there no constitution, no law,
no court can do much is to help it while it lies that it needs no constitution,
no law ,no court ", to save it. The
question is whether the laws speaking through the authority of the courts
to deal with such threat to the security of the state, shall be absolutely
silenced and reduced mute spectator because of such threat. The answer has to be given to the
public. A raise weary of its own blood
shed and diversities should cultivate public opinion which may offer the only
chance for the survival of the species.
The best guarantee for such situation is good sense of those in power,
the vigilance of the people and the pressure of the public opinion.
This is an alarming situation which spell out the
gravity and further invite peoples co-ordination to formulate public opinion to
fight through the policy of non- co-operation which has provided the
independence from the British rule by our leader Mahatma Gandhi .
“Every day that comes and goes,
every mile the river flows,
says to me and say to you,
much there is to learn and do,
for the water and the day,
no more will pass this way”.
Mankind has a habit of surviving
worst catastrophes created by its own
error or by violent turn of the nature
and it must be so if there is any meaning in its existence, if its history and
continuous survival is not the accident of a fortuitously self organising chance which it must be a purely materialistic view of the
nature of the world. If man intended to
survive and carry forward the evolution of which he is at present the head and to some extent of half conscience leader
of its march , he must come out of this
present chaotic life and arrive at the
organised efforts. The ideal situation
would be fulfilled by the accomplishment and preservation of the people from
its own extinction by the folly committed by his own species.
